Unfortunately, non-animal in-vivo testing is way more expensive than traditional animal testing, and these cosmetic mega-companies just don’t care about anything except their profit margins. If they didn’t, those statements wouldn’t even be there. When a company includes vague statements like quoted above, you can bet your buns that they’re going to take advantage of the legal wiggle room those statements provide. Sorry, Cinnamon Bun.Īlso, as a note, I’ve worked for manufacturers in the Health & Beauty industry. :/ So technically, they’re not cruelty-free. And mainland China still requires, at this time, animal testing. While they seem to be working toward being truly cruelty-free, they still sell in China. “An exception could be made if regulatory authorities required it for safety or regulatory purposes.” This is right after their bolded statement in the link you provided. I’m keen to know if Jurlique really do test on animals in any part of the manufacturing of the product. Is this why they are on the “yes” list? In that case, any company who exports their products to China would be under the same obligation – which puts a bit of a different spin on it don’t you think? The company itself doesn’t test on animals, but in order to be able to export into China, the products are tested on animals before entering the market. They do say that it is law for products that are imported into China to be tested on animals and that this is done through 3rd party Chinese testers. Is this true or not? Have they worded it to exclude other areas of testing? Just curious. Just wondering about Jurlique? Their policy on Animal Testing ( )states that they actually don’t – “We do not test our cosmetic and therapeutic products on animals as part of our product development process, or outsource this activity to any third parties, nor have we ever included animal testing in our product development process in the past”. Once we realize that we’ve been tricked into paying for cruelty. Also, affordable economy size refill, and, much less expensive in certain stores. Also sheets laundry detergent, also didn’t like.īut, Method surface cleaner & glass cleaner are very effective, great light natural scent, leaping bunny certified, and safe to use around pets and kids. No, I won’t miss my former brands.Īlso, I’ve tried Blueland surface cleaners, but they weren’t effective for me. Whatever discomforts my journey takes me on, It’s nothing compared to an animal alone in a sterile cage with no friends or toys or grass to play on…while the evil scientist makes them violently ill. My wide eyed Vegan stare just got a little more dazed. Looking for cruelty-free brands?įor a list of cruelty-free brands, visit our list of 350+ vetted cruelty-free brands. This list only includes companies that claimed they test on animals at some point, or sell in China there are many other companies who remained silent about their animal testing policy. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. All the brands mentioned on this list, however, do test on animals. The same goes for Too Faced and Becca (now owned by Estee Lauder but still cruelty-free) and Tom’s of Maine (Colgate-Palmolive). While in most cases, brands that are owned by companies that test on animals are not cruelty-free, L’Oreal is one of the few companies to own brands that have kept their ethical stances and have remained cruelty-free under the ownership. The second exception consists of a few select brands. This does NOT mean the company is or will be cruelty-free in the near future! It’s only a small step in the right direction, and the company still DOES test on animals at this point. PETA currently lists Colgate-Palmolive as “working toward regulatory changes to reduce the number of animals used for testing”. There are however two exceptions, the first one being Colgate-Palmolive, which have agreed to gradually change their policy. These companies own the majority of the brands we commonly find in most retailer stores and drugstores, and they’re making no real efforts to change their unethical policies. Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive, Reckitt Benckiser, Church & Dwight, Unilever, and Henkel. Most of these brands are owned by a few giant corporations: L’Oreal, Estee Lauder, Procter & Gamble, Clorox, Johnson & Johnson, S.C. Click here to find out more and claim your May box. Every month, we bring you up to $195 worth of cruelty-free and vegan products for only $34.99 with our subscription box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |